Censorship and tyranny

I got banned from posting and commenting on Facebook yesterday for 24 hours for spreading "misinformation". The "misinformation" that I spread was a scientific article from a Stanford researcher entitled 'Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis'. I tried to post the same article today and was banned for another 3 days. 

In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act ~ George Orwell

The conclusion in the above article states:

"The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health". 

Just imagine that Facebook deems this "misinformation". The real misinformation is coming from the utter quackery that we have to put up with, along with the 24/7 fear mongering, gas lighting and censorship of real science. Science is nowhere to be seen in the mainstream.

When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say ~ George R.R. Martin

Vaccine passports

I find the idea of forcing or coercing anyone into any medical intervention appalling. Where there is risk, there must be choice.⁣

⁣I am totally against vaccine passports, which is medical apartheid. There are many people who can't, or don't want to, take experimental technologies with emergency use authorisation only, and this right should be respected and enshrined in law. There are many who have suffered vaccine injuries and death and anyone in denial of this, is in denial.⁣ Where is the science instead of the spin, marketing and advertising?

Segregating and discriminating against people based on their vaccination status belongs in Nazi Germany. No one should be opted out of life because they are forced to take part in a clinical trial. This violates the first Nuremberg Code: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential".⁣

⁣Let's remind ourselves that this virus has a survival rate above 99.95% in the under 70s and even higher in children. If older people were being genuinely protected and looked after, they would not have been left to die in nursing homes. They would have been given vitamin D, Ivermectin and HCQ and other therapeutics, instead of waiting a whole year for experimental technologies that had only undergone 9-10 months of trials.⁣

⁣I've had enough of the 24/7 fear mongering, criminality, abuse, gaslighting, emotional blackmail, virtue signalling, constant changing of goalposts and the deliberate traumatisaton of us all, but especially children. It is heinous what is going on.⁣

⁣I am pro choice, pro REAL science, pro informed consent, pro freedom ALL THE WAY. What is going on right now in the name of "health" is criminal and has to stop.⁣

⁣Image and caption by @attuningforks⁣

Has being trauma informed gone out the window when it comes to masks?⁣

There are many people who cannot wear masks. Covering their mouth and nose triggers and retraumatises them. I don't think I need to go into the details as to why this can happen.⁣

⁣There is also the fact that many people cannot breathe well with masks on, whether this is because of physical issues like asthma, or mental health issues like PTSD. They are all valid reasons not to wear a mask. Please watch the latest video by barrister Tracey O'Mahony on ridiculing the disabled. It is illegal in Ireland to discriminate against anyone who cannot wear a mask. Know that you can legally exempt yourself, check out Tracey's video here on how to do that.

⁣

I also believe that people who do not want to wear masks have that right. Masks are a medical intervention and there should always be choice whether to consent to, or decline, any medical intervention, in any decent and democratic society.⁣

"The" science is not settled on this matter because there is no such thing as "the" science. That implies consensus, and there is no consensus or agreement on whether masks work. Let's be honest, any science that goes against the one accepted narrative is disparaged and censored. Censorship is always part and parcel of any tyranny.⁣

⁣

What has really shocked me is the shaming, criticising, bullying, ridiculing, emotional blackmailing and manipulating of people who do not wear masks and calling them "anti-maskers". People have been refused service in shops etc for not wearing masks when they have exemptions. This has happened to me and it was extremely upsetting. This is illegal under Disability and Equality Acts in many countries, and people are taking cases. ⁣

⁣

https://disabilityrights.org.uk write that "The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to supermarkets warning them that they should not be discriminating against disabled people unable to wear face covering". You can also contact the EHCR with any complaint.⁣

⁣

I have seen and heard people in the mental health field express disdain for those who don't wear masks because they say they are not protecting others. Without any empathy or understanding as to why people don't/can't wear masks. How on earth is this a trauma informed approach?

It really beggars belief. It is adding to the abuse and gaslighting that is making people question themselves and their sanity.

For the first 4-5 months of the pandemic, we were told not to wear masks, then they were mandated in many countries. This constant changing of goalposts has been employed many times during the last year and it is a typical abusive tactic. The goalposts will never be reached, no matter what you do.  The most obvious example being "This is the new normal until a vaccine arrives". The vaccine has arrived and yet because they only treat symptoms, do not confer immunity and do not prevent transmission, so lockdowns, masks and social distancing etc. have to continue.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-124394/v1

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

https://search.mercola.com/results.aspx?q=masks#stq=masks

https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

THE BIG PRINT GIVETH and the small print taketh away ~ Dr Marcus de Brun

I am pro choice in all health matters. I believe in body autonomy and sovereignty in all cases. Informed consent and refusal for all medical interventions should never be under threat and should be ensured and enshrined in law. Our human rights should be upheld and should not be in any danger, which they currently are. The very first item in the Nuremberg Code states: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential". This should always be the case in any decent and democratic society.

1. COVID VACCINES ARE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

These vaccines have only had 9-10 months trials. Safety and efficacy have not yet been proven. Anyone claiming they are safe and effective is spreading misinformation. These experimental vaccines have emergency use authorisation only, they do not have approval. They cannot have approval after such short trials. Vaccine trials normally take 10 to 20 years to complete. There have been many deaths, serious "side" effects and people contracting covid from the vaccines. In just over a month. The fact is, the trials are continuing with humans being effectively experimented upon until 2023, at minimum. These "vaccines" are experimental, with never used before technology says Dr Mike Yeadon, former VP and chief scientific officer of Pfizer.

2. COVID VACCINES PREVENT TRANSMISSION AND CONFER IMMUNITY

The vaccines only treat symptoms, they were not trialled to prevent transmission, hospitalisations, deaths or confer immunity. As they do not confer immunity, they do not fit the legal definition of what a vaccine is. They were only tested on young health people, not pregnant women, children, the elderly or the immuno compromised.

3. COVID 19 IS A DEADLY VIRUS FOR EVERYONE

Covid 19 has a survival rate above 99.95% in the under 70s, Professor John Lee. It affects older people, mostly those over 80, with underlying conditions. Covid 19 can be prevented and the severity of its effects lessened, with treatments we already have available, like Ivermectin and Vitamin D etc. Vaccines, just like any other medical intervention, should be a choice.

4. THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL UNTIL A VACCINE ARRIVES

Because covid vaccines only treat symptoms, decimating lockdowns, social distancing, restrictions and masks will continue, as we have been recently told by government. Changing the goalposts often, is a common abusive tactic. They are never reached, if they are they are changed. It builds up hope, only to be consistently dashed, leading people to question their sanity and be brought to their knees. We were initially told that it would take 15 days to flatten the curve in March 2020, and here we are in lockdown number 3 in Ireland, until at least the end of March 2021, if not longer. Nearly 11 months of lockdowns and restrictions. For what? See 27 papers showing the "collateral damage" of lockdowns.

5. VACCINES ARE THE ONLY TREATMENT FOR COVID 19

Treatments and prophylactics like Ivermectin, Vitamin D, intravenous Vitamin C, Hydroxychloroquine (which has been politicised and linked to Trump, so anyone who mentions it is a Trump supporter and therefore not to be believed) are not being widely used. How can governments honestly say that the vulnerable are being protected? They are not. Study after study can be found on pubmed.gov showing how beneficial Vitamin D is to the prevention and severity of covid19.

6. VACCINE PASSPORTS AND CERTIFICATES ARE NEEDED FOR TRAVEL, WORK ETC

There is no difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated: both can transmit the virus and neither have immunity. You can get immunity by contracting the virus naturally, thereby building herd immunity within the community and genuinely protecting the vulnerable. The fact that these "passes" are even being contemplated in democratic societies is heinous and criminal. They flout the Nuremberg code and all human rights' charters. I don't know how they can be legal. Don't we learn anything from history?

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society ~ Jiddu Krishnamurti

Covid, trauma and mental health

What does covid have to do with trauma and mental health? Everything.

It is appalling what is happening in the name of "health". A recent article in the Independent newspaper in Ireland wrote "Vaccine certificates may be needed to attend social gatherings or sporting events once the majority of the population are vaccinated". The article goes on to say "At the launch of the National Covid-19 Vaccination Programme, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly said certificates could play a key role in the fight against coronavirus if the vaccine significantly reduces transmission of the disease".

They know that these vaccines DO NOT prevent transmission. The trials were not designed to do anything but treat/suppress symptoms. Many people don't realise this.  A recent article from The British Medical Journal stated that: "None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus". So why are they needed? Why all the talk of mandating/forcing/coercing them?

These new, gene based vaccines using mRNA technology, have never been used before. Already there have been serious adverse events from the trials and initial vaccinations; Bells Palsy, Anapylactic shock and they have been contraindicated for women who are pregnant or wishing to become pregnant. 21% of people in the Moderna trials had serious adverse effects. Where there is risk, there HAS TO BE choice.

These vaccines were all tested on healthy, young people not older people with underlying conditions. Dr Mike Yeadon, former VP and chief scientific officer with Pfizer, says that no fit or healthy person need take this vaccine, only older and vulnerable people. And they also have a choice in this. Yet we are being forced/coerced to do so which contravenes the Nuremberg Code.

This is about medical freedom, informed consent and refusal and bodily sovereignty. I cannot believe that vaccine papers are even being contemplated. Where are we? The third Reich? This shows just how important it is to resolve individual, collective and intergenerational trauma because otherwise it repeats itself, over and over and over again. This is what we are now seeing in action.

Fear is being whipped up at every available opportunity which sounds my radar. People feel trapped, helpless and terrified. How on earth is this good for our health, mental or physical?

Medical freedom and body sovereignty

My radar sounds when anyone wants us afraid and to keep us afraid, using every opportunity to whip fear up.

My radar sounds when there is only one narrative allowed.

My radar sounds when there is no scientific debate.

My radar sounds when experienced doctors and scientists who don't agree with the one accepted narrative are discredited, smeared and censored.

My radar sounds because the inventor of the PCR tests, Kary Mullis, said it was not to be used for diagnostic purposes but they are used for exactly that purpose. Many scientists have spoken out against this and they have been ignored.

My radar sounds when the cycles on the PCR tests are too high producing false positives that are called cases.

My radar sounds when hatred towards a group who are pro science is allowed, incited and encouraged.

My radar sounds when I hear that governments are considering and some implementing, forced medical procedures.

My radar sounds when they want to punish those who decline a "warp speed" experimental vaccine (Dr Mike Yeadon, former chief scientific officer for Pfizer) with no travel, education, concerts, sports, restaurants, in person shopping etc.

My radar sounds when lockdowns are used, even though many many scientists have said they do not work, to prevent the spread of a virus with an above survival rate of 99.95% for under 70s (Professor John Lee).

My radar sounds when the vulnerable are not looked after and even left to die in nursing homes, despite all the virtue signalling and empty words.

I want to know why it is ok to say this in a national newspaper: "Given what is at stake, a refusal to vaccinate is the socialisation of manslaughter" ~ Gerard Howlin

I want to know why professor Brian Lucey of Trinity College Dublin can get away with tweeting this: "Bluntly, we need to make those who opt out to know they are opting out of sport, education, travel, socialising and in-person shopping. If that takes a mandatory passport showing your jabbed, so be it" ~ Professor Brian Lucey

I want to know why professor Luke O'Neill, also of Trinity, could go to a classroom and tell students they "should" get vaccinated and they might need to wear a wristband that doesn't come off to show they've been vaccinated if they want to go to their debs (prom). He also made fun of people who want their civil liberties and said they would say "Not on my wrist".

Dr Mike Yeadon, former chief scientist at Pfizer

God it's good to hear people tell the truth. Dr Mike Yeadon is one of the ethical scientists, speaking common sense and real science about the covid situation. He dares question the ONE accepted narrative from the mainstream which is what true science does: welcomes questions. Questions propel science forward. We're not hearing much science, just fear mongering and marketing for selling unsafe drugs.

He tweeted this brilliant piece last night on twitter. Another article you might want to read is 'Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science' from the British Medical Journal. Things are changing and people are waking up to probably the biggest hoax in the history of humankind.

"I’ve got news for any state which thinks it’s being cute by getting around the illegality of mandates by instead using COERCION. 

Just make your life increasingly unmanageable, so you ‘volunteer’ for it. 

No. 

That’s also illegal & such states will find themselves prosecuted by groups of concerned citizens & others. 

I still have no idea why this is happening, but I do know that the facts warrant offering (with full informed consent) vaccination only to the most vulnerable (by virtue of age and/or certain chronic illnesses). 

Absolutely no one else needs to consider vaccination. 

Perhaps in several years to come, in the usual fashion, as the thickness of the safety database grows, and we learn what these experimental medicines are really like, in the real world, those a few years below a rational but somewhat arbitrary age threshold might step forward & request vaccination. 

Not only is it not indicated from a medical perspective for others than those who demonstrably at elevated risk of severe illness & death, but such others will be adding an unknown risk for no benefit. 

No doctor is going to involve themselves in such a mass vaccination campaign. 

So if you notice mention of people other than healthcare professionals being involved, you have to put your collective feet down.

I’m constitutionally pro-vaccination & I’ve worked in & around ‘big pharma’ all my working life. 

But a rushed series of vaccines? They’re not needed.

So like mention of “waves”, I immediately smell a rat. 

We know that approximately 50% of the population were already immune to SARS-COV-2 before it arrived in U.K. 

The quality and number of original research papers published this year shows it’s a ‘hot’ area. 

It’s very clear. We know that it is real and we even know the mechanism (previous exposure to viruses with common regions to those in the new virus, in this case endemic common cold causing coronaviruses). 

This is a very well-trodden route whereby the human immune system learns how to defend itself against related hazards. 

Analogous to the cowpox exposures protects against smallpox story we were all taught at school, after the questionable experiments conducted by Edward Jenner. 

That’s why after only a low % of population were infected, there were too few remaining susceptible people to support a consolidated & growing outbreak to occur. 

That’s when I knew I was being lied to. 

While the laws of immunology aren’t as immutable as those of chemistry, for example, they’re pretty solid. 

They’re what keeps you safe & well, mostly, in a sea of invisible microorganisms. 

So there isn’t any question that the U.K. population is protected by “herd immunity” at a national level.  

It is possible that due to unhelpful actions by Govt a few areas might be just below HI. 

But as this immunity is robust & durable, it’s simply not possible for this “2nd wave” we’re being told is happening to actually be as described. 

There’s a major problem somewhere. 

I think it’s inside the testing system. I can’t think of a reason for this other than to prompt receptiveness to vaccination. 

And on policies designed to increase acceptance of vaccination, even by those not at any notable risk from this virus, we see all sorts of things which were just unthinkable last year. 

Making ‘freedom’ contingent on it. I don’t think we’ve long to make clear, as a free & democratic people, we tell with one voice, everybody who’s suborned their humanity to be involved in whatever this is, that we reject you and all your works.

And of all the most objectionable works, the one which must cease is PCR mass testing. 

Scientifically, a technique which was at its very limits in the spring (& did a pretty good job) has been changed & locked in the lighthouse. 

These structures are as old as seafaring. They’re not meant to gone close to, by most of us, as they’re a warning signal. 

Stay away...stay away...they blink. Telling us not to come close. 

For in coming close, we know what happened numerous times in the past when seafarers misunderstood the cues, misread the warnings. 

The first time you would learn you’d gone horribly wrong, was also beyond the last time for a safe outcome. 

Warnings from history? I don’t know". 

Your microbiome and your health Zach Bush MD

 

This video is excellent, an example of real science from a real doctor who I really admire, Zach Bush MD. The first 5 minutes are crucially important in understanding how we deal with respiratory viruses like Covid19. I hope it will leave you feeling empowered, hopeful and reassured.